10 Comments

Conventional Oil peaked in 2005 http://www.euanmearns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/C-Cdec141.png

According to Rystad, the current resource replacement ratio for conventional resources is only 16 percent. Only 1 barrel out of every 6 consumed is being replaced with new resources

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Biggest-Oil-Gas-Discoveries-Of-2019.html

Oil Discoveries are at record lows https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/icbkDFACM4iA/v2/800x-1.png

Shale binge has spoiled US reserves, top investor warns Financial Times.

Preface. Conventional crude oil production may have already peaked in 2008 at 69.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) according to Europe’s International Energy Agency (IEA 2018 p45). The U.S. Energy Information Agency shows global peak crude oil production at a later date in 2018 at 82.9 mb/d (EIA 2020) because they included tight oil, oil sands, and deep-sea oil. Though it will take several years of lower oil production to be sure the peak occurred. Regardless, world production has been on a plateau since 2005.

What’s saved the world from oil decline was unconventional tight “fracked” oil, which accounted for 63% of total U.S. crude oil production in 2019 and 83% of global oil growth from 2009 to 2019. So it’s a big deal if we’ve reached the peak of fracked oil, because that is also the peak of both conventional and unconventional oil and the decline of all oil in the future.

Some key points from this Financial Times article: https://energyskeptic.com/2021/the-end-of-fracked-shale-oil/

Shale boss says US has passed peak oil | Financial Times https://archive.ph/tjl6J

Our energy predicament, including why the correct story is rarely told https://ourfiniteworld.com/2022/07/28/the-worlds-self-organizing-economy-can-be-expected-to-act-strangely-as-energy-supplies-deplete/

Expand full comment

It’s such a tired issue and Germans and Europeans are the problem, you do not want nuclear, do not want to drill for gas, or even geothermal. Just buy Russian for Heaven sake and burn all the forest down man. Let’s move on

Expand full comment

I totally disagree with you, what we see now is a picture of what globaliseing looks like when we are not all friends anymore.

Today it is gas in Europe, tomorrow it is uranium for the nuclear power plants in the USA (20% of US electricity), the day after tomorrow it is microchips in China, then it is battery metals in the West, then it is REE for US fighter planes, etc. ...

If you need to blame someone or something, it's globalization, this is going to continue until the world finds a new state of equilibrium - and it won't last forever either.

Expand full comment

Doomberg says the storage capacity of these countries doesn’t come close to matching demand needs for even a short period of time;

THIS winter is still in play for catastrophe.

Can you please look into the data behind your opening statement?: “Russian gasflows…have actually been decent, which allowed Europe to partly frontload the supply.” Details of storage relative to typical usage, please.

Expand full comment

It may partly be a reference to this. Russia shut off flows via NS 1, but it’s not the only pipeline that they use to send gas to Europe. The pipeline that flows through Ukraine is apparently still running with significant volume.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russian-gas-flows-eu-via-ukraine-remain-stable-nord-stream-stays-shut-2022-09-06/

Expand full comment

He used the term “frontload” which implies storage, but he didn’t provide data on storage capacity. Europe is screwed so long as they allow the Biden warmongers to prevent a peace deal.

Expand full comment

"The crisis now unfolding, however, is entirely different to the 1970s in one crucial respect… The 1970s crisis was largely artificial. When all is said and done, the oil shock was nothing more than the emerging OPEC cartel asserting its newfound leverage following the peak of continental US oil production. There was no shortage of oil any more than the three-day-week had been caused by coal shortages. What they did, perhaps, give us a glimpse of was what might happen in the event that our economies depleted our fossil fuel reserves before we had found a more versatile and energy-dense alternative. . . . That system has been on the life-support of quantitative easing and near zero interest rates ever since. Indeed, so perilous a state has the system been in since 2008, it was essential that the people who claim to be our leaders avoid doing anything so foolish as to lockdown the economy or launch an undeclared economic war on one of the world’s biggest commodity exporters . . .

And this is why the crisis we are beginning to experience will make the 1970s look like a golden age of peace and tranquility. . . . The sad reality though, is that our leaders – at least within the western empire – have bought into a vision of the future which cannot work without some new and yet-to-be-discovered high-density energy source (which rules out all of the so-called green technologies whose main purpose is to concentrate relatively weak and diffuse energy sources). . . . Even as we struggle to reimagine the 1970s in an attempt to understand the current situation, the only people on Earth today who can even begin to imagine the economic and social horrors that await western populations are the survivors of the 1980s famine in Ethiopia, the hyperinflation in 1990s Zimbabwe, or, ironically, the Russians who survived the collapse of the Soviet Union."

https://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2022/07/01/bigger-than-you-can-imagine/

Expand full comment

I totally agree with you.

Expand full comment

if only the EU could persuade the US to lift the sanctions now that Ukraine is winning the war. Trade could resume. The war may carry on till the end.

Expand full comment

Thank you for the analysis. Despite the war impact, energy crisis, inflation, the dollar wrecking ball, etc. currency hedged European ETF's are still outperforming the S&P 500 year to date. I know rates have not moved up the same way they have in the US but does that still seem reasonable or is there another big leg down? I can't imagine how all the potential bad news there isn't already priced in.

Expand full comment